Lynx Renard
SBA Lending DataEvery 7(a) lender, market and industry, from the SBA’s own public record. Free to use.

Texas Capital Bank

SBA 7(a) lending record · FDIC certificate 34383

Approvals from SBA fiscal year 2008 onward. Source data as of 2026-06-30.

$392.3M approved across 277 loans in 63 counties across 17 states. Its largest market is Harris, TX. Approvals peaked in FY2025.

Approvals by year

ApprovedLoansCharged offLoss rate
FY08$1.1M50.00%
FY09$1.6M60.00%
FY10$714K20.00%
FY11$212K10.00%
FY13$385K20.00%
FY15$7.5M30.00%
FY16$10.0M70.00%
FY17$27.4M19$1.1M3.85%
FY18$55.1M34$1.6M2.94%
FY19$53.6M37$720K1.34%
FY20$41.8M230.00%
FY21$28.2M20$1.6M5.64%
FY22$11.2M7withheld
FY23$13.3M14withheld
FY24$31.5M27withheld
FY25$71.2M43withheld
FY26$37.3M27withheld

SBA fiscal years end 30 September. The most recent year is usually partial, since the file is published quarterly. Charge-offs are recorded against the year a loan was approved, so a recent year’s dollars are real but its rate is withheld until the cohort has had time to fail.

Where it lends

RankCountyLoansApprovedShare of county
1Harris, TX72$98.8M1.2%
2Dallas, TX44$51.4M0.9%
3Collin, TX18$32.1M1.2%
4Tarrant, TX23$27.7M0.7%
5Williamson, TX9$25.9M2.2%
6Bexar, TX14$15.5M0.7%
7Travis, TX10$12.8M0.5%
8Brazoria, TX4$11.9M2.2%
9Fort Bend, TX6$10.9M0.7%
10Denton, TX7$6.2M0.3%
11Maricopa, AZ5$5.3M0.1%
12Brazos, TX2$5.0M2.3%
13Saint Lucie, FL1$4.4M1.1%
14Guadalupe, TX2$4.4M2.2%
15Montgomery, TX4$4.3M0.4%
16Cook, IL1$4.3M0.1%
17Waller, TX1$4.0M3.3%
18Polk, TX2$3.8M4.9%
19Santa Clara, CA1$3.4M0.1%
20Rockwall, TX1$3.2M1.3%
21Linn, OR2$2.8M2.2%
22St John The Baptist, LA1$2.7M11.7%
23Miami-Dade, FL1$2.5M0.1%
24Hays, TX3$2.4M0.6%
25Lamb, TX1$2.3M34.1%

Top 25 of 63 counties.

What it lends into

RankIndustryLoansApprovedShare of book
1Health care & social assistance43$84.0M21.4%
2Accommodation & food services43$45.5M11.6%
3Other services29$40.2M10.2%
4Manufacturing21$37.9M9.7%
5Wholesale trade19$32.1M8.2%
6Construction21$31.8M8.1%
7Retail trade18$20.8M5.3%
8Professional & technical services16$19.6M5.0%
9Transportation & warehousing16$14.4M3.7%
10Administrative & waste services11$13.8M3.5%
11Arts, entertainment & recreation8$9.0M2.3%
12Educational services6$8.8M2.2%
13Mining & extraction4$8.5M2.2%
14Real estate & leasing5$8.0M2.0%
15Manufacturing5$7.8M2.0%
16Manufacturing6$6.5M1.7%
17Retail trade3$1.6M0.4%
18Information2$1.3M0.3%
19Finance & insurance1$553K0.1%

Realised losses

0%2%4%6%too recent to judgeFY2008: 0.00% lostFY2009: 0.00% lostFY2010: 0.00% lostFY2011: 0.00% lostFY2013: 0.00% lostFY2015: 0.00% lostFY2016: 0.00% lostFY2017: 3.85% lostFY2018: 2.94% lostFY2019: 1.34% lostFY2020: 0.00% lostFY2021: 5.64% lost'08'11'16'19'22'25'26
Charge-offs to date as a share of what was approved in each fiscal year. Point at a year for its figures. The line stops at FY2021: cohorts approved after that have not had time to fail, so their rates are withheld rather than drawn near zero.

$5.0M charged off against $392.3M approved across every year on record, a realised rate of 1.27%. Counting only the cohorts old enough to judge, FY2008–2021, the rate is 2.19%.

Loss rates cover every approval year on record together. SBA 7(a) losses peak two to four years after approval, so a lender whose lending is mostly recent will show a low rate because its loans have not aged yet, not because they are performing better.

About this data

Built from the U.S. Small Business Administration’s 7(a) FOIA data release, a public record covering approvals from fiscal year 2008 onward and refreshed each quarter. SBA fiscal years end 30 September, so the most recent year is partial. Figures are approvals, not outstanding balances, and SBA attributes each loan to the institution that holds it today rather than the one that originated it — an acquisitive lender therefore shows books it did not write.

The in-depth breakdown of Texas Capital Bank

These pages show what SBA publishes about one lender. Lynx puts it in context and asks what it means:

  • Where a loss rate stands. Against the median 7(a) lender and against a cohort of comparable banks, not on its own.
  • Whether share is rising or falling, county by county, and which markets were entered or have gone quiet.
  • Who is competing for the same counties, ranked by what they write there rather than by their national size.
  • How concentrated the book is, measured against lenders of similar reach so the figure means something.
  • Which loans arrived by acquisition, so a vintage is not credited to a charter that never wrote it.
  • The same rigour on the balance sheet — capital, liquidity, concentration and stress, printed into a board pack.