Firms come to us with the country nobody has written up, the counterparty whose ownership nobody has traced, the corridor or exposure nobody has priced. Each is scoped to the question and delivered as work a committee can act on and defend. We read primary sources, in the original language where that matters.
Each is a scoped piece of work with a deliverable and a date: a country written up, a counterparty traced, an exposure priced. Taken on their own, or alongside a Renard membership where one is already in place.
A full file on a country the desk does not yet cover: the five pillars computed, the judgment layer written, and a read that says what would have to change for the score to move.
A named path, whether sanctions, a devaluation, a succession or a border closure, carried through to what it does to your exposure, with the assumptions stated so they can be argued with.
Who actually owns the firm, across the corporate register, the leak record and the state’s own structure. This is the question a name on a contract does not answer.
Your counterparties and their owners read against the designation lists and the regimes behind them, with the secondary-sanctions reach stated rather than assumed.
Pull a supplier out and see what cannot be replaced. That is the counterfactual behind every sanctions argument, measured against what the registers actually record moving.
Which ports, corridors and straits your goods depend on, what each one carries, and what a closure of any of them does to the route and to the cost.
Services are decision-support only. Not investment, legal, tax, or sanctions-compliance advice.
If one of these engagements is what your team needs, whether a country written up, a counterparty traced or an exposure priced, say so and we’ll scope it to your file.